(Bewerkt door Kompjoeterpetoeter om 13:06, 22-03-2011)

Bij Barefeats zijn ze niet zo te spreken over de 3D performance van jouw iMac plus grafische kaart.

UPDATED CONCLUSION
The Aluminum iMac (2.8GHz, 2.4GHz) with the Radeon HD 2600 Pro GPU disappointed us when it came to 3D gaming. It lost to the previous generation iMac (2.33GHz) with the optional GeForce 7600 GT in most 3D games we tested. And the Aluminum iMac (2.0GHz) with the Radeon HD 2400 XT was a slower than the older iMac 2.0 with the Radeon X1600!

In in all fairness, the Radeon HD 2600 Pro is the "stock" GPU. Compared to the previous "stock" GPU (GeForce 7300 GT), it was faster overall. We expect, since the Radeon 2600 Mac OS X driver is brand new, that performance optimizations will be made to it in the near future. We're hoping ATI/AMD will perform some magic to make it more competitive. If they can't, then I hope Apple will offer a CTO optional, faster GPU -- as they did on the previous iMac and as they currently do on the Mac Pro.

Note that the 2.4GHz iMac produced essentially the same 3D Gaming results as the 2.8GHz iMac. That's because they both have the same GPU (Radeon HD 2600 Pro) and our tests were GPU limited rather than CPU limited. So for iMac gamers on a budget, that's an important factoid.

Pieterr om 13:59, 22-03-2011

Bij Barefeats zijn ze niet zo te spreken over de 3D performance van jouw iMac plus grafische kaart.

Dat had ik al begrepen...